Here’s what you need to know:
- The UN General Assembly rejected a US-backed resolution that didn’t blame Russia.
- Instead, they supported a European-backed Ukrainian resolution demanding Russia pull out its troops.
- This shows some cracks in the international support for Ukraine, but also a clear message to Russia.
- Tensions are rising between the US and Ukraine over how to handle the conflict, especially with Trump’s recent comments.
What Just Happened at the UN?
The UN General Assembly, a body of 193 member states, had two resolutions on the table. The first, backed by the US, called for an end to the war but didn’t point the finger at Russia for starting it. The second, supported by European nations and Ukraine, demanded Russia immediately withdraw its forces.
In a bold move, the Assembly rejected the US resolution and approved the Ukrainian one. This sends a strong signal that the international community, for the most part, still recognizes Russia as the aggressor in this conflict.
Why Did the US Proposal Fail?
Many saw the US resolution as a way to appease Russia, especially given President Trump’s recent attempts to negotiate with Moscow directly. The resolution’s failure indicates that many countries aren’t willing to ignore Russia’s actions, even if the US is pushing for a different approach.
Cracks in the Alliance? Support for Ukraine wavers slightly.
While the Ukrainian resolution passed, it’s worth noting that it received fewer votes than previous resolutions condemning Russia. This suggests that some countries may be growing weary of the conflict or are seeking a different solution.
The Ukrainian resolution passed 93-18, with 65 abstentions. Previous votes saw more than 140 nations condemn Russia’s aggression and demand its immediate withdrawal.
Trump vs. Zelenskyy: A War of Words
The relationship between President Trump and Ukrainian President Zelenskyy seems to be deteriorating. Trump has called Zelenskyy a “dictator” and accused Kyiv of starting the war – claims that Zelenskyy has dismissed as Russian disinformation.
These tensions have further complicated the situation at the UN, with the US even putting forward its own competing resolution instead of supporting Ukraine’s.
What Does This Mean for the Future?
The UN vote is a symbolic victory for Ukraine, but the real impact remains to be seen. The conflict is still ongoing, and the US is still pushing for its own solution, including a vote in the UN Security Council, where it holds veto power.
Key Players Speak Out
Mariana Betsa, Ukrainian Deputy Foreign Minister: Emphasized Ukraine’s right to self-defense and called on nations to stand against Russia’s violation of the UN Charter. She said her country is exercising its “inherent right to self-defense” following Russia’s invasion.
Dorothy Shea, U.S. envoy: Argued that previous UN resolutions have failed to stop the war and advocated for a commitment from all member states to bring a durable end to the war.
Nicolas De Riviere, France’s U.N. ambassador: Proposed amendments to the U.S. resolution to reflect the reality of Russia’s aggression against Ukraine.
The Security Council Angle
The US also wants a vote on its proposal in the more powerful U.N. Security Council, where resolutions are legally binding and it has veto power along with Russia, China, Britain and France. This could lead to further clashes and potential vetoes, making it difficult to reach a consensus.
General Assembly vs. Security Council: What’s the Difference?
The General Assembly is like a global town hall, where all member states can voice their opinions. However, its resolutions are not legally binding. The Security Council, on the other hand, has the power to pass legally binding resolutions, but its decisions can be blocked by any of the five permanent members (US, Russia, China, Britain, France).
Breaking It Down: The Amendments
France proposed three key amendments to the US resolution:
- Replacing “Russia-Ukraine conflict” with “full-scale invasion of Ukraine by the Russian Federation.”
- Reaffirming commitment to Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.
- Calling for a just and lasting peace that respects the UN Charter.
What’s Next?
The situation remains fluid, and the conflict in Ukraine is far from over. The UN vote highlights the ongoing divisions within the international community on how to address the crisis. Whether the US and Ukraine can bridge their differences remains to be seen.
About The Author
