- Tragic Flood: A flash flood at Camp Mystic resulted in multiple fatalities.
- FEMA’s Role: Buildings were removed from flood maps after appeals.
- Expansion Concerns: Camp expanded in a known flood plain.
- Insurance Implications: Map changes could have affected insurance requirements.
- Expert Warnings: Critics question the exemptions granted to the camp.
Camp Mystic Flood: A Disaster Foretold?
The recent flash flood at Camp Mystic in Hunt, Texas, was a nightmare. But was it a surprise? Not exactly. According to a bombshell investigation by The Associated Press, federal regulators might have played a role in setting the stage for this tragedy.
For years, Camp Mystic, a prestigious girls’ summer camp, operated and even expanded in a dangerous flood plain. But here’s the kicker: the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) repeatedly granted appeals to remove the camp’s buildings from its 100-year flood map. This meant less oversight and potentially lower insurance costs – but also, critics argue, a disregard for obvious risks.
The Flood Map Mystery: How Did Camp Mystic Get Off the Hook?
Back in 2011, FEMA designated Camp Mystic as being in a “Special Flood Hazard Area.” This meant the camp needed flood insurance and faced stricter rules for any new construction. This designation indicates that there’s a 1% chance of a severe flood happening in any given year. However, over time, the camp successfully appealed to have buildings removed from this designation.
Records show that FEMA amended the flood map in 2013, removing 15 buildings from the hazard area. These were part of the original Camp Mystic Guadalupe, the site ravaged by the recent flood. Further appeals led to 15 more structures being removed in 2019 and 2020, this time at the Camp Mystic Cypress Lake site, which opened in 2020.
Why Does It Matter? The Insurance Angle
Experts suggest that Camp Mystic’s push to amend the FEMA map might have been a move to dodge flood insurance requirements, lower premiums, or make way for cheaper renovations and new buildings. Syracuse University professor Sarah Pralle, who has extensively studied FEMA’s flood map determinations, found it disturbing that a camp responsible for so many young people would receive exemptions from basic flood regulation. It raises the question: Are the wealthy and well-connected getting special treatment when it comes to flood risk?
Was the Risk Obvious? Experts Weigh In
Even without FEMA’s maps, the danger was clear. According to an AP analysis of data, at least 12 structures at Camp Mystic Guadalupe were entirely within FEMA’s 100-year flood plain. Jeremy Porter, head of climate implications at First Street, argues that FEMA’s flood insurance map underestimates flood risks because it doesn’t fully account for heavy rainfall on smaller waterways.
FEMA’s Response: Just Snapshots in Time?
FEMA downplayed the significance of the map changes, stating that flood maps are just “snapshots in time” designed to show minimum standards and not predictions of where flooding will occur. But critics argue this response is inadequate given the potential consequences.
Camp Expansion: A Recipe for Disaster?
Despite the known flood risks, Camp Mystic not only continued to operate but dramatically expanded. The owners cited the “tremendous success” of the original camp as the reason for opening a second site nearby, including new cabins, a dining hall, and other facilities. This expansion raises questions about whether local officials prioritized development over safety.
The Aftermath: Lessons Learned?
While local officials may have believed they were following existing regulations, the intensity of the recent flood surpassed anything in the county’s history. As Chris Steubing of the Texas Floodplain Management Association put it, “Mother Nature set a new standard.” The tragedy at Camp Mystic highlights the urgent need for more accurate flood risk assessments and a greater emphasis on safety, especially when children are involved.
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Camp Location | Along the Guadalupe River in a known flash flood area. |
| FEMA Actions | Granted appeals to remove buildings from flood maps. |
| Possible Motivations | Avoiding insurance requirements and facilitating expansion. |
| Expert Concerns | Flood risks were underestimated and exemptions were questionable. |
About The Author
