In a move that’s sending ripples through Ondo State, a prominent royal family is pulling out all the stops to ensure their lineage is officially recognized in a crucial chieftaincy declaration. This isn’t just about names on a paper; it’s about history, bloodlines, and the right to rule! The Ondo State Government is currently in the hot seat, reviewing the Ajama Chieftaincy Declaration, a document that’s as old as time (well, almost). The key players here are the Iseyemi-Aragbuwa Dynasty of Olekoyu, who are basically saying, ‘Hey, we’re part of this royal story too!’ They’ve put together a solid case, backed by history and oral traditions, to have their ancestral claims acknowledged. This review process promises to be interesting as it could reshape the traditional leadership landscape of Ode-Erinje. Here’s a quick rundown of what’s brewing:
- A royal family is demanding inclusion in an official chieftaincy declaration.
- The Ondo State Government is reviewing a historical document.
- The family claims a right to the throne based on their royal bloodline.
- This could lead to a change in how the next monarch is chosen.
The ‘Royal Blood’ Demand: A Family’s Fight for Legacy
The heart of this matter lies with the Iseyemi-Aragbuwa Dynasty of Olekoyu. They’ve formally submitted a memorandum to the committee tasked with reviewing the Ode-Erinje Chieftaincy Declaration. Their lawyer, Ayokanmi Akinbuluma, and the head of the dynasty, Deacon Olowomuke Omosehin, presented a compelling argument before the committee, which is headed by the Commissioner for Local Government and Chieftaincy Matters, Amidu Takuro. This isn’t just a casual request; they are pushing for their family to be officially recognized as one of the ruling houses eligible to produce the Orungberuwa of Ode-Erinje. The current declaration, which was signed into law by the late Governor Oluwarotimi Akeredolu, is seen by this dynasty as incomplete, missing a vital piece of their royal heritage.
Unearthing History: Evidence of Royal Entitlement
To back their claim, the Iseyemi-Aragbuwa Dynasty has presented a treasure trove of historical and oral evidence. They argue that their lineage has an inherent, hereditary right to the stool. According to their submission, the Akinlalu line’s entitlement to the Orungberuwa stool was derived through Odunye, also known as the Liseri of Erinje, and her children—Lusote, Orolalatan, and Akinlalu. This means that descendants from these lines have historically held the monarchical position. They are proposing that the amended declaration be renamed the “Akinlalu/Aragbuwa or Liseri Ruling House” to accurately reflect this shared royal heritage. It’s about ensuring historical accuracy and promoting communal harmony by acknowledging all rightful heirs.
The Grievance: Exclusion and Inequity
The dynasty feels it’s unfair that the current records only list the Akinlalu Ruling House while excluding the descendants of Iseyemi-Aragbuwa. They state quite clearly: “The original concession to Akinlalu was situational, not permanent. It did not extinguish the claims of Lusote’s descendants. Therefore, it is inequitable for the current record to list only the Akinlalu Ruling House while excluding the Iseyemi-Aragbuwa descendants, who are equal heirs by blood and tradition.” This highlights a perceived historical oversight that they are determined to correct. The tradition, they assert, has always seen the Liseri title in Erinje alternate between the descendants of Iseyemi-Aragbuwa and Akinlalu, a pattern that speaks volumes about their shared royal lineage.
The Committee’s Task: Navigating Tradition and Law
The committee, comprising Amidu Takuro, Bode Akinyemi, Adesanya Adelana, Ade Akinbosade, and Oladele Adesanmi, now faces the weighty task of reviewing these submissions. Their job is to meticulously examine the evidence and make recommendations that uphold fairness and the established customs of the land. This process is crucial for maintaining peace and ensuring that chieftaincy titles are conferred according to the rightful order of succession. The decision will not only affect this particular dynasty but could also set a precedent for future chieftaincy reviews in Ondo State. It’s a delicate balancing act between historical documentation and the living traditions of the people.
Beyond the Throne: What This Means for Ondo
The review of the Ajama Chieftaincy Declaration is more than just an internal administrative matter; it speaks to the broader themes of identity, heritage, and justice within Ondo State. Ensuring that official documents accurately reflect the historical and traditional realities is vital for the social cohesion of communities. Such reviews help to prevent disputes and foster a sense of belonging among all the constituent families of a traditional ruling system. The government’s willingness to revisit and amend these declarations demonstrates a commitment to inclusive governance and the preservation of cultural legacies.
It’s important to note that while this article focuses on the chieftaincy dispute, other news from Ondo State includes concerning reports like the tragic incident in Ore where a carpenter allegedly killed his grandmother, and the ongoing efforts by the state government to address health crises like Lassa fever. These diverse stories paint a picture of a state grappling with both deep-rooted traditions and contemporary challenges.
Key Takeaways for the Chieftaincy Declaration Review
Here’s a table summarizing the core elements of the family’s claim:
| Family Dynasty | Claimed Entitlement | Proposed Name Change | Basis of Claim |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iseyemi-Aragbuwa Dynasty of Olekoyu | Eligibility to produce Orungberuwa of Ode-Erinje | Akinlalu/Aragbuwa or Liseri Ruling House | Historical evidence, oral tradition, rotational succession |
| Current Akinlalu Ruling House | Solely recognized in existing declaration | N/A | Concession noted as ‘situational’ by claimants |
The resolution of this matter will be watched closely, as it touches upon the very fabric of royal succession in Ondo State. Will the government embrace the call for historical correction, or will the status quo prevail? Only time, and the committee’s diligent work, will tell.
About The Author
