- Controversy: Proposal to make Alaafin permanent chair sparks outrage.
- Key Players: Ibadan and Ogbomoso Mogajis strongly object.
- Historical Practice: Rotational chairmanship is the core issue.
- House of Assembly: Bill currently under review, awaiting stakeholder input.
- Tension Alert: Concerns raised about undermining peace and tradition.
Royal Power Struggle: Ibadan and Ogbomoso Unite Against Alaafin’s Permanent Chairmanship
Hold up! There’s a major shakeup happening in Oyo State’s traditional leadership. The Mogajis (chiefs) from the Soun Ruling Houses in Ogbomoso have thrown a serious jab at the idea of making the Alaafin of Oyo the permanent chairman of the Oyo State Council of Obas. They’re calling the proposed change a straight-up break from historical norms and a big-time challenge to the state’s traditional institutions.
What’s the Big Deal? Rotational vs. Permanent
After a visit to the Oyo State House of Assembly, the Mogajis made it crystal clear that the chairmanship of the council has always been a rotational thing. They believe keeping it that way is the only way to ensure everyone gets a fair shake. “Mogajis from Ogbomoso, along with their Ibadan counterparts, showed up in force at the Oyo State House of Assembly this morning,” they stated firmly.
The Mogajis emphasized their deep respect for the late Alaafin, Oba Lamidi Adeyemi, recognizing his long reign and the respectful relationship he maintained with the people of Ibadan. “We honored Oba Adeyemi for his age and wisdom, especially after he spent over 50 years on the throne. But he never disrespected Ibadan people, so this current Alaafin needs to be careful,” they warned.
The Proposed Hierarchy: Who Gets the Crown?
Here’s the tea: the bill being debated suggests the Alaafin of Oyo should be the permanent chairman, with the Olubadan of Ibadan as his deputy, and the Soun of Ogbomoso taking the spot as vice-chairman. If this goes through, the current rotational system would be tossed out the window, replaced by a fixed pecking order. The Alaafin would run all meetings, the Olubadan would step in when he’s out, and the Soun would only preside if both are MIA.
Ibadan’s Loud No: Obas, Chiefs, and Community Groups Stand Firm
This isn’t coming out of nowhere. Ibadan leaders, including Obas, Mogajis, Baales, and various community groups, have been screaming for a rotational chairmanship for ages. They want the three top traditional rulers to share the power equally. This whole leadership drama has already caused issues in the council under previous rulers.
What’s Next? The House Committee Weighs In
The bill has already passed its second reading on May 15 and is now chilling with the House Committee on Chieftaincy Matters and State Honors. Once they’ve gathered input from all stakeholders, it’ll head back to the floor for a third reading. This is a crucial moment for the future of the Oyo State Council of Obas.
Echoes of Discord: Concerns Over Peace and Tradition
The President of the Ibadan Mogajis, Asimiyu Ariori, and the Coordinator of the Ibadan Compounds Peace Initiative, Mogaji Nurudeen Akinade, are singing the same tune: no permanent chairmanship! They argue it’s a slap in the face to historical practice and could stir up trouble in the state. They’re begging the House of Assembly not to ignore tradition and risk creating unnecessary tension.
Here’s a little extra spice: “The Speaker of the Oyo State House of Assembly, Hon. Debo Ogundoyin, received an award as ‘Most Outstanding Friend of Ibadan’ at the grand finale of the 2025 Ibadan week. All the House members were there, including the Deputy Speaker. That speaks volumes,” the statement pointed out.
The Bigger Picture: The Role of Traditional Councils in Modern Governance
The Oyo State Council of Obas, like similar bodies across Nigeria, plays an advisory role to the state government on matters of culture, tradition, and community development. Its influence can be significant, particularly in resolving local disputes and maintaining social order. The composition and leadership of these councils, therefore, are often subjects of intense political maneuvering.
Potential Ramifications
The outcome of this debate could set a precedent for other states grappling with similar questions of traditional leadership. A move towards permanent chairmanship could consolidate power in the hands of a few, while a continuation of the rotational system could promote inclusivity and prevent any single ruler from becoming overly dominant.
About The Author
