Woman Fined £25,000 for Wild, False Rape Claim After One-Night Stand!

A UK court has ordered Cynthia Chia to pay a hefty £25,000 after she falsely accused businessman Idowu Ogunkanmi of rape. This drama, stemming from a one-night stand, turned into a nine-year nightmare of harassment and libel. Get the full scoop on this shocking case!

Here’s a quick rundown of what you’ll find in this article:

  • The initial encounter and the false accusations.
  • The impact on the businessman’s life and reputation.
  • The court’s decision and the damages awarded.
  • The broader implications for social media and accountability.

The One-Night Stand That Spiraled Out of Control

It all started in a London nightclub back in 2015. Idowu Ogunkanmi, a 44-year-old energy trader, met Cynthia Chia. A night of partying led to a one-night stand. Seems simple enough, right? Wrong! Within months, Cynthia Chia launched what the court described as a ‘sustained, relentless and vindictive’ campaign of harassment that lasted almost nine years. Imagine waking up every day to face accusations of something you didn’t do – that’s what Idowu Ogunkanmi had to endure.

From Consensual Encounter to Rape Accusation

The situation escalated when Chia accused Ogunkanmi of having sex with her friend, Prisca Okoye. Both Ogunkanmi and Okoye denied the accusation. But that was just the beginning. Chia began demanding money and threatened to ‘destroy’ Ogunkanmi. When he refused to be extorted, she took her campaign online.

The Social Media Smear Campaign

Chia created multiple Instagram profiles, posting defamatory statements accusing Ogunkanmi of rape, sharing his name and photo publicly. She even alleged he had bribed police officers and medical staff to destroy evidence. Think about the impact of such accusations – reputation ruined, business deals lost, and constant fear of public judgment.

The Court Battle and the Verdict

Ogunkanmi sued Chia for defamation and harassment. Chia didn’t even bother to show up in court or hire a lawyer. The judge ruled in Ogunkanmi’s favor, awarding him £25,000 in damages. Deputy High Court Judge Susie Alegre emphasized that there was absolutely no truth to Chia’s defamatory posts. She highlighted the malicious intent behind the posts and the years of harassment Ogunkanmi had endured.

The Devastating Impact on a Man’s Life

Ogunkanmi described being ‘traumatized’ and ‘shocked’ by the allegations. He believes Chia was trying to extort him and, when that failed, she resorted to a hateful Instagram campaign. He expressed concerns about the power of social media to destroy lives, saying, ‘Anyone can just go to the internet now or Instagram, create a fake post and say anything about anyone.’ He fears that such unchecked accusations could drive people to suicide or cost them their jobs and families.

A Call for Social Media Accountability

Ogunkanmi believes social media companies need to take more responsibility for the content posted on their platforms. He argued that it’s too easy for people to create fake posts and spread lies without any repercussions. This case highlights the urgent need for better regulation and accountability on social media to prevent similar situations from happening in the future. Imagine the internet without any checks and balances – a breeding ground for false accusations and ruined lives.

Related Incidents and Legal Consequences

Adding another layer to this bizarre story, Chia physically attacked Prisca Okoye several times due to her obsession with Ogunkanmi. Chia was convicted of common assault and sentenced to 10 weeks in prison, with a restraining order for five years. This shows the extent of Chia’s obsession and the real-world consequences of her actions.

The Judge’s Final Word

Deputy High Court Judge Susie Alegre made it clear that the consensual sexual encounter between Ogunkanmi and Chia did not justify the horrific campaign of harassment, abuse, and defamation he endured for over nine years. The judge also granted injunctive relief to protect Ogunkanmi’s reputation and right to a private life. This case serves as a stark reminder of the devastating impact of false accusations and the importance of holding people accountable for their actions online.

Share this article

Back To Top